Skip to main content

Table 2 Within-group and total frequencies of answers and results of testing boot-swabs for Mycobacterium avium ssp. paratuberculosis genome

From: Identification of different attitudes towards paratuberculosis control using cluster analysis applied on data from an anonymous survey among German cattle farmers

  

Group 1

Group 2

Group 3

Group 4

Total

‘Informed sceptics’

‘Deniers’

‘Affected supporters’

‘Free supporters’

Count

44

37

46

98

225

 

%

%

%

%

%

State

Saxony

38.6

54.1

50.0

49.0

48.0

Thuringia

61.4

45.9

50.0

51.0

52.0

Herd type

Dairy cows

70.5

73.0

80.4

62.2

69.0

Suckler cows

18.2

10.8

8.7

26.5

9.8

Mixed

9.1

13.5

8.7

9.2

18.7

Missing answer

2.3

2.7

2.2

2.0

2.2

Herd size a

≤ 10

4.5

2.7

0.0

7.1

4.4

11–100

15.9

10.8

10.9

25.5

18.2

101–500

47.7

43.2

32.6

45.9

43.1

>  500

31.8

35.1

56.5

19.4

32.0

Missing answer

0.0

8.1

0.0

2.0

2.2

Paratuberculosis has been known for... a

Today

4.5

0.0

2.2

2.0

1.3

The recent year

6.8

2.7

0.0

13.3

7.6

≤ five years

29.5

21.6

13.0

30.6

25.5

> five years

59.1

67.6

84.8

54.1

63.6

Missing answer

0.0

8.1

0.0

0.0

2.2

Enrolmenta

Yes

2.3

18.9

54.3

15.3

32.2

No

88.6

62.2

37.0

73.5

67.7

Missing answer

9.1

18.9

8.7

11.2

11.6

Boot-swab result a

MAP-positive

15.9

51.4

52.2

17.3

3.1

MAP-negative

79.5

43.2

47.8

79.6

29.8

Not evaluable

4.5

5.4

0.0

3.1

67.1

  1. a The frequencies were not independent from the groups in a Bayesian Poisson regression model for contingency tables