Skip to main content

Table 2 Responses of veterinary surgeons (n = 77) to 11 statements relating to animal physiotherapy

From: Perceptions of animal physiotherapy amongst Irish veterinary surgeons

Statement

Strongly agree N (%)

Agree N (%)

Neither N (%)

Disagree N (%)

Strongly disagree N (%)

Appropriate career path: qualification as chartered physiotherapist then post graduate APT qualification

27 (35)

37 (48)

6 (8)

5 (6)

2 (3)

Interested in learning more about APT

23 (30)

46 (60)

5 (6)

2 (3)

1 (1)

APT often used as last resort

7 (9)

28 (36)

16 (21)

21 (27)

5 (7)

Register of chartered APTs should be set up in Rep. of Ireland

37 (48)

34 (44)

4 (5)

2 (3)

0 (0)

Cost of APT does not deter animal owners from seeking treatment

11 (14)

42 (55)

7 (9)

16 (21)

1 (1)

APTs should have the right of first referral

4 (5)

17 (22)

18 (23)

31 (41)

7 (9)

APTs unable to assess musculoskeletal and neurological disorders in animals

4 (5)

21 (27)

19 (25)

26 (34)

7 (9)

Willing to allow an APT to choose their own treatment

17 (22)

53 (69)

4 (5)

3 (4)

0 (0)

Good communication between VS and APT is unnecessary for effective management of animals

7 (9)

4 (5)

2 (3)

26 (34)

38 (49)

More research should be published on APT

30 (39)

44 (57)

2 (3)

1 (1)

0 (0)

VS and APTs working in joint practices would enhance liaison between both professions

28 (36)

45 (59)

4 (5)

0 (0)

0 (0)

  1. APT = Animal physiotherapist/physiotherapy VS = Veterinary Surgeons