Table 1 Animal characteristics in each test group
From: Comparative palatability of five supplements designed for cats suffering from chronic renal disease
Product | Number of cats | Mean age (years) | Mean weight (kg) | Sex ratio and sterilisation status | Normal appetite level (g/day) | Number of feedings per day | Usual food |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Azodyl® | 34 | 4 | 3.87 | 12 females | 55 to 70 g | 2 | Premium or Super premium kibbles (High diversity) |
5 sterilised females | |||||||
17 neutered males | |||||||
Ipakitine® | 35 | 3.5 | 3.69 | 13 females | 55 to 70 g | 2 | Premium or Super premium kibbles (High diversity) |
5 sterilised females | |||||||
17 neutered males | |||||||
Pronefra® | 37 | 3.5 | 3.83 | 13 females | 55 to 70 g | 2 | Premium or Super premium kibbles (High diversity) |
5 sterilised females | |||||||
19 neutered males | |||||||
Renalzin® | 35 | 3 .5 | 3.69 | 13 females | 55 to 70 g | 2 | Premium or Super premium kibbles (High diversity) |
4 sterilised females | |||||||
18 neutered males | |||||||
Rubenal® | 31 | 4 | 3.87 | 9 females | 55 to 70 g | 2 | Premium or Super premium kibbles(High diversity) |
5 sterilised females | |||||||
17 neutered males |