Open Access

Low reproductive performance and high sow mortality in a pig breeding herd: a case study

Irish Veterinary JournalThe official journal of Veterinary Ireland, the representative body for the veterinary profession in Ireland200861:818

DOI: 10.1186/2046-0481-61-12-818

Published: 1 December 2008

Abstract

Sow performance is a key component of the productivity of commercial pig farms. Reproductive failure in the sow is common in pig production. For every 100 sows served, 89 should farrow. In absence of specific diseases such as porcine parvovirus, pseudo-rabies, swine fever, leptospirosis and brucellosis, management failures are the most important causes of loss. A syndrome associated with reproductive inefficiency, and post-service vaginal discharge and high sow mortality in a commercial pig farm is described. Pregnancy failures exceeded 20% and sow mortality exceeded 12% for two consecutive years. The abnormal post-service vaginal discharge rate was 1.7% during the period of investigation.

An investigation involving an analysis of farm records, a review of breeding management practices, clinical examinations, laboratory analysis and examination of urogenital organs was conducted.

The main contributing factors found were a sub-optimal gilt breeding management, an inadequate culling policy in combination with a sub-optimal culling rate and the presence of cystitis in more than 1% of the urogenital organs examined. The high sow mortality rate was related to an aged breeding herd.

A control programme was recommended based on management changes involving oestrus detection, movement of gilts post-service, hygiene in the service area, boar exposure post-service and urinary acidification. This programme failed to increase the farrowing rate due to incomplete implementation of the recommendations made. The farrowing rate increased to 86.5% subsequent to a farm manager change in January 2005, which resulted in complete implementation of the control programme.

Keywords

cystitis farrowing rate sow vulval discharge

Introduction

The farrowing rate, described as the percentage of females served that farrowed related to first mating, decreased from an average of 86% in 2001 to 77% during the years 2002 and 2003 on a 620-sow farrow-to-finish unit. Alexander and Muirhead [3] suggested a target farrowing rate of 89%. The analysis of reproductive failures indicated that the reproductive losses during pregnancy were mainly due to high returns to oestrus and a high rate of non-pregnancy in sows. An investigation took place involving analysis of farm records, clinical examination, laboratory analysis and examination of urogenital organs. The main contributing factors to the reproductive problem in the herd were found to be sub-optimal gilt breeding management, an inadequate culling policy and the presence of cystitis in sows.

Case history

The herd was an integrated 620-sow unit producing pigs for slaughter. Sows were accommodated in three dry sow houses. The main dry sow house was a fully slatted, fan-ventilated house with 345 stalls with a service area containing 68 sow stalls. There were five farrowing rooms fully slatted with automatically controlled fan ventilation, each with 28 farrowing crates. The vaccination programme operated is shown in Table 1.
Table 1

Vaccination programme (1999-2006)

 

Parvovirus/Erysipelas1

E. coli 2

Aujeszky's3

Gilts

2 ml at selection

2 ml, 3 weeks later

2 ml at 6 and

3 weeks pre-farrowing

2 ml at selection

Sows

2 ml, 7 days post-

farrowing

2 ml at weaning

2 ml every six months

Boars

2 ml every 6 months

-

2 ml every six months

1 Parvoruvax™. Merial Animal Health Ltd., Essex, UK

2 Neocolipor™, Merial Animal Health Ltd.

3 Porcilis Aujeszky's. Intervet Ireland, Ireland. Discontinued in 2004.

Typically, sows were weaned on Thursdays and oestrus detection was conducted in the presence of a boar once a day from Monday vto Wednesday. Sows were served in the service area in the presence of a boar. Ninty-eight per cent of services were by artificial insemination (AI). The timing of services in relation to first detection of onset of oestrus is outlined in Table 2.
Table 2

Timing of service relative to detected onset of oestrus

 

Time of service: Day post-weaning

First detected oestrus

Day 4

Monday

Day 5

Tuesday

Day 6

Wednesday

Day 7

Thursday

Monday AM

PM

AM

  

Tuesday AM

 

AM

AM

 

Wednesday AM

  

AM

AM

Semen doses were delivered three days a week and some repeat sows were served by boars. Sows were moved immediately after second service to dry sow accommodation. They were pregnancy tested at 28 days after service and transferred to the farrowing rooms on day 110 of pregnancy. The lactating feed curve is outlined in Table 3. Additional water was available from nipple drinkers. The average lactation length was 26 days. Replacement gilts were home bred. During 2003, an average of five gilts were served per week. Before September 2003, gilts were selected at six months of age and raised up to 115 kg bodyweight in finishing pens, then moved to a gilt pool shed accommodating 60 gilts in three pens, and a boar in an adjoining pen. The stocking density was 2.7 m2 per gilt. Gilts were offered a gilt rearing ration ad libitum until served.
Table 3

Lactating feed curve

In September 2003, due to a continuous fertility problem in gilts, the farm manager established the replacement gilts in finishing pens, in three areas:
  1. 1.

    A holding pool with selected gilts (95-120 kg), offering a finisher diet ad libitum;

     
  2. 2.

    A service pool (120-150 kg), offering a lactating sow diet ad libitum. It accommodated 49 gilts in seven pens. The stocking density was 2.7 m2 per gilt; and,

     
  3. 3.

    A service pen (Figure 1).

     
Figure 1

Service pen used in the unit after September 2003.

Oestrus detection in the gilt service pool was conducted once a day. Gilts were artificially inseminated in a service pen in the presence of a boar and transferred three to five days after second service to sow stalls in the dry sow house until day 110 of pregnancy. They were offered dry sow ration following the same feeding regime as pregnant sows (Table 4).
Table 4

Dry sow feed curve

 

Feed level

Day post weaning

Kg/day

MJ DE/day

1

3.4

44.2

5

3.0

39.0

7

3.0

39.0

35

2.7

35.1

42

2.1

27.3

92

2.4

31.2

110

2.1

27.2

The farrowing rate was low for two consecutive years and Water to meal ratio = 6.5:1; Energy: 13 MJ DE per Kg of feed sow mortality rate was high. The manager contacted the author's practice requesting a veterinary investigation

Investigation

The main areas of investigation are outlined below:

  • Analysis of farm records

  • Past laboratory reports

  • Clinical examinations

  • Sample collection

  • Examination of urogenital organs

1. Analysis of farm records

The farm records were examined in January 2004.

Reproductive performance

The farrowing rate fell from 86% in 2001 to 77% in 2002-2003. The reproductive losses were mainly due to repeat breeders and sows found to be non-pregnant (Table 5).
Table 5

Analysis of reproductive failures (January 2001-December 2003)

 

Jan-Dec 01

Jan-Dec 02

Jan-Dec 03

Target1

Farrowing rate %

86.0

77.6

76.3

89

Regular returns % 18-24/39-45 days

n/a

6.6

8.0

5

Irregular returns % 23-38 days

n/a

7.0

5.2

2

Total returns %

8.0

13.6

13.2

7

Sows not in pig % NIP ( > 45 days)

n/a

5.6

5.5

1

Abortions %

0.8

1.1

1.5

<1

Culled pregnant %

3.7

0.6

1.6

<1

Dead pregnant %

2.1

1.5

1.7

1

Pigs sold per sow per year

22.5

22.0

20.5

23

1 Alexander and Muirhead (1997)

Farrowing rates were low for all parities in 2003. Gilts had an exceptionally low rate of 66%. Sows of parity over six had a farrowing rate of 83% (Table 6).
Table 6

Farrowing rate (FR) analysis by parity, 2003

 

Sows & gilts

Sows only

Gilts only

Parity 1

Parity 2

Parity 3

Parity 4

Parity 5

Parity 6

Parity 7

> 7

FR %

76

78

66

68

80

77

79

77

82

82

85

The reproductive losses in sows and gilts for 2003 were compared (Table 7). Repeats, found not-in-pig and sold in-pig rates were high in sows and especially in gilts.
Table 7

Farrowing rate analysis in sows compared with gilts, 2003

 

Sows & gilts

Sows only

Gilts only

Farrowing rate %

76.3

78

66

Regular repeats %

18-24 days

5.6

5

8.9

Regular repeats %

39-45 days

2.4

2

4.8

Irreg. repeats %

25-38 days

5.2

5

6

Found empty %

NIP (>45 days)

5.5

5

8

Abortions %

1.5

1.5

1.6

Sold in pig %

1.6

1.4

2.8

Dead pregnant %

1.7

1.7

1.6

Parity profile

The herd parity profile was high. In January 2004, the average parity, excluding unserved gilts, was five. Aherne [1] suggested an optimal average herd parity of between 2.5-3.0.

Although the replacement rate was adequate at 40.5%, the low farrowing rate in gilts resulted in insufficient gilt farrowings (Table 8). Consequently, the culling rate was reduced and old sows (parity over six) were retained. The parity distribution of the herd was examined (Table 9) and compared with the ideal parity distribution suggested by Finn [8]. The percentage of young animals (less than parity three) was satisfactory in the period October 01 to February 02, but became too low from July 2002.
Table 8

Analysis of sow removals, 2003 (Total breeding herd of 620 sows)

 

No. of animals

%

TARGET 1 %

Sow mortality rate

84

14

3-5

Sow culling rate

160

26.4

35-36

Removal rate

(mortality + culling)

244

40.4

39-40

Replacement rate

247

40.5

39-40

1 Muirhead [11]

Table 9

Parity distribution analysis

  

% Litters

   

Parity

% litters

Target

Oct 01-

Feb 02

July 02-

Nov 02

Dec 02-

May 03

Jun 03-

Dec 03

1

20

18.9

12.0

12.5

12.1

2

18

23.3

10.4

10.5

9.7

3

17

21.8

18.1

10.1

9.2

4

16

12.2

21.5

15.1

11.6

5

14

7.8

16.3

19.3

16.6

6

10

7.6

8.7

13.8

16.7

7

4

3.0

7.8

7.2

10.6

8

1

3.1

3.7

5.8

6.5

>8

0

2.4

1.6

5.6

7.0

Whole herd

100

100

100

100

100

GILT POOL (gilts available for service per 100 sows)

12-151

4.8

4.8

4.8

7

1 Suggested target by Carroll [6]

Sow mortality was high, averaging 7.6% for 2001, 10.7% in 2002 and 14% in 2003. Muirhead [11] suggested a target of 3-5%.

Sow feed consumption

The average daily feed intake (ADFI) per sow during lactation was 5.5 kg in 2003. This was lower than the target of 6.2 kg suggested by Carroll [6].

2. Past laboratory reports

Blood samples were collected from 20 sows in March 2003. Seram samples were analysed for evidence of porcine reproductive and respiratory syndrome (PRRS), and infection caused by Leptospira australis, Leptospira bratislava and Leptospira muenchen. The results were negative in all cases with the exception of low titres (1/100) in three sows to Leptospira muenche, which were not considered significant.

3. Clinical examinations

A farm visit was carried out on January 20, 2004. The following areas were assessed:

Service routine

Sows were served in the presence of a boar, allowing nose-to-nose contact between the sows and the boar during service. Service technique was found to besatisfactory.

Gilt services management

Oestrus detection was conducted using the back-pressure test in the absence of a boar. Gilts in oestrus were served immediately in a boar pen and again 24 hours later. They were brought back after service to the pen where detection occurred and moved to sow stalls three to five days after second service.

Vaginal discharges

One sow was found with mucopurulent vaginal discharge 11 days post-service. Discharges are considered to be abnormal after seven days post-service [12]. Abnormal vaginal discharge, mastitis or agalactia was not observed in lactating sows.

Sow stalls
Six stalls in the main dry sow house were damaged (Figure 2), allowing some sows to escape and injure other sows by mounting them.
Figure 2

Build-up of faeces behind the sow and damaged stalls in the dry sow house.

Service area hygiene

Washing and disinfection was not being carried out. A build-up of faeces was evident behind some sows (Figure 2).

Dry sow house lighting

Fluorescent lights were switched on for six hours a day. Light intensity at sow level was 200 lux in different areas of the house.

Boar exposure

Only one boar was present in the gilt pool area. In the dry sow houses boar contact was not maintained after service.

Sow body condition

Body condition was scored at weaning, using a visual condition scoring system based on a 10-point scale described by Whittemore [20]. Condition score two is thin and boney, while eight is evident fat. A minimum condition score of around fouris the target at weaning and sows should farrow with a minimum condition score of about six. Scores above seven and below three are unacceptable at any time. Sow condition was variable. Between 20-25% of the weaned sows had a condition score four or less, and 75-80% had a score of five.

Lactating sow feeding and water supply

Some feed troughs appeared very clean suggesting underfeeding. Water was supplied via a computerised liquid feed system in the morning and evening time; water nipples were not present in the troughs.

Sow mortality

No dead sows were available for necropsy during the investigation period. A number of culled sows were condemned due to emaciation. On-farm sow euthanasia level was high due to injuries, lameness or poor general health.

4. Sample collection

The following samples were collected as part of the laboratory investigation:

Water samples

Drinking water samples were collected and submitted for analysis. Coliform organisms were detected, but numbers were lower than acceptable limits for livestock (less than 5,000 total coliforms/100 ml and less than 1,000 faecal coliforms/100 ml) suggested by the US Environmental Protection Agency [16].

Blood samples

Blood samples were collected from 20 sows and subjected to serological assays for PRRS, Aujeszky's disease (AD), Swine Influenza (SI) and Leptospira spp were carried out. PRRS and AD results were negative. Swine influenza H1N1 and H3N2 titres were negative or less than or equal to 1/80 in some sows, which was not considered significant. No titres for Leptospira australis titres were detected. Leptospira bratislava and Leptospira muenchen titres were negative except for a titre of 1/100 which was not considered to be significant.

5. Examination of urogenital organs

Ten sows were culled on January 29, 2004 as a result of poor reproductive performance and their urogenital tracts were examined. The findings of the examination are outlined in Table 10.
Table 10

Summary of findings/results of examination of urogenital organs on January 29, 2004

Sow number

Uterus

Bladder

 
 

Gross findings/result

Cystitis

Comment/results

N/A1

Normal

Yes

-

1580

Normal

Yes

-

N/A

Normal

No

-

N/A

Normal

No

-

2204

Pus/E. coli

Yes

Pus/E. coli

N/A

Normal

No

-

1799

Normal

Yes

Haemorrhage

1364

Normal

Yes

-

N/A

Normal

No

-

N/A

Normal

No

-

1 N/A: Not Available

Fifty per cent of the bladders examined had evidence of cystitis (Figure 4). Kidneys were not examined.
Figure 4

Cystitis in a bladder of a culled sow.

Swabs were collected from gross lesions in the uterus, cervix and bladders and two urine samples were collected for bacteriology. Oviducts from four sows were collected and subjected to a fluorescent antibody test (FAT) for Leptospira bratislava with negative results. Escherichia coli was isolated from the bladder, the cervix and urine sample of sow number 2204.

On February 13, 2004 nine infertile sows were culled. The urogenital organs, including kidneys were examined. Gross changes were similar to previous ones (Table 11). Seventy-eight per cent of bladders examined had thickened walls and hyperaemia of the mucosa. All kidneys were normal and E. coli was isolated from the bladder of sow 1596.
Table 11

Summary of findings/results of examination of urogenital organs on February 13, 2004

Sow number

Uterus

Bladder

 

Kidney

 

Gross findings/results

Cystitis

Comment/results

Comment

1201

Normal/-

No

-

Normal

1402

Normal/Proteus sp.

Yes

-

Normal

1448

Normal/-

Yes

-

Normal

2111

Normal/-

Yes

Hyperamic

Normal

1596

Normal/-

Yes

-/E. coli

Normal

1990

Normal/-

Yes

-

Normal

2023

Normal/-

Yes

-

Normal

1546

Normal/-

Yes

-

Normal

2078

Normal/-

No

-

Normal

Diferential diagnosis

  1. 1.

    PRRS was excluded on the basis of negative serological results;

     
  2. 2.

    Aujeszky's disease was excluded on the basis of negative serological results;

     
  3. 3.

    Swine influenza H1N1 and H3N2 was excluded on the basis of absence of clinical signs and insignificant serological titres (lower or equal to 1/80);

     
  4. 4.

    Porcine parvovirus was excluded on the basis of an effective vaccination programme and absence of an increase in mummifications which remained below 0.5% of pigs born. Muirhead [12] specified less than 0.5% as a target level for mummifications;

     
  5. 5.

    Leptospira infections were excluded on the basis of negative serology results and negative FAT results on fallopian tube samples;

     
  6. 6.

    Cystitis;

     
  7. 7.

    Poor gilt management routine, including inadequate oestrus detection, overfeeding regime post-service and stress associated with possible mounting of served gilts still on heat by pen mates; and,

     
  8. 8.

    Inadequate culling policy.

     

Diagnosis

Following examination of farm records, clinical, urogenital examinations and laboratory investigations, the main contributory factors to the problem were:

  • Infectious:

Cystitis, associated with E. coliinfection.

  • Non-infectious:

Sub-optimal oestrus detection frequency; Sub-optimal gilt oestrus detection technique;

Overfeeding during the immediate post service period; and, Inadequate culling policy leading to an aged breeding herd.

Recommended control programme: recording of abornmal post-services discharges

The farm manager was instructed to record the following details for each sow:

  • Sow identification and parity;

  • Number of days post-service; and,

  • Subsequent reproductive performance. The farmer was also instructed to collect vaginal swabs in a sterile manner. A demonstration of the correct technique to avoid contamination was provided.

Recording of presumptive cause of sow death

This was introduced in January 2004 and was determined by the clinical assessment of the carcase, within the limitations, by the farm manager or submission when possible to the laboratory.

Oestrus detection - service programme

It was recommended that oestrus detection be carried out twice a day for gilts and sows in the presence of a mature boar. Services were to be carried out when standing oestrus was first detected and repeated 24 hours later. This recommendation wasnot implemented.

Management of gilt services

Gilts were to be moved from the gilt pool accommodation to gilt pens in the sow service area at the first recorded oestrus and then served in stalls on the second recorded oestrus. This recommendation was not implemented.

Target gilt services per week

In January 2004, it was advised to increase gilt services to 10 services per week, to compensate for low farrowing rates and to allow for an increased culling rate of old sows.

Hygiene programme in the service area

Removal of faeces from behind the sows and power washing and disinfection between batches was recommended for the prevention of ascending urogenital infections. The recommendations were not implemented.

Modification of sow stalls

The rear of the stalls in the dry sow house was modified in April 2004 to ensure that all sows were confined in stalls Figure 3).
Figure 3

Rear view of the sow stalls showing design modification.

Boar exposure

It was recommended that boar contact in the dry sow houses and gilt pool area be increased. This measure was disregarded.

Pregnancy testing frequency

Pregnancy testing was conducted twice, at 28 days post-service and repeated at 42-50 days.

Gilt nutrition

A revised feeding programme was recommended (Table 12).
Table 12

Gilt feeding programme

Bodyweight

(Kg)

Event

Diet

Feed density

(MJ DE/Kg)

Feed Level

(Kg/day)

95-120

Selection

Gilt

13

2.5

121-135

Transfer into sow service area until service

Lactating sow

15

Ad libitum

>135 kg

2nd service to farrowing

Dry sow

13

2

Nutrition during lactation

Feed levels were adjusted daily according to individual sow condition and appetite.

Light intensity in service area

Light intensity was increased to 250 lux at sow level. A timer was installed to ensure exposure to 14 hours light per day.

Culling policy

A guideline to the recommendations made is outlined below:

  • Weaned sows with shoulder sores, ulcerated hocks or traumatic injuries;

  • Sows with abnormal vulva discharge; and,

  • Old sows (parity over seven).

Water supplied to pregnant sows

An extra six litres of water per day, between the morning and the evening feeding times was provided to each pregnant sow using a computerised liquid feed system. The extra water supplied was generally consumed.

Dietary urinary acidifier

Ammonium chloride (97%) was included in the dry sow ration at a rate of 6 kg per tonne and in the lactating sow ration at a rate of 2.5 kg per tonne for eight consecutive weeks, commencing in late January 2004.

Subsequent case outcome i

  1. 1.

    The farrowing rate remained low: 76% in 2003; 77% in 2004. The analysis of the reproductive performance between June and December 2004 is outlined in Table 13, 14. The repeat, not-in-pig and culled pregnant sow rates were high.

     
Table 13

Analysis of farrowing rates by parity (June-December, 2004)

%

Sows & gilts

Sows only

Gilts only

Parity 1

Parity 2

Parity 3

Parity 4

Parity 5

Parity 6

Parity 7

>7

FR

78

82

65

78

89

86

79

82

83

83

82

FR: Farrowing rate

Table 14

Analysis of reproductive failures (2004)

%

Jun 04

Jul 04

Aug 04

Sept 04

Oct 04

Nov 04

Dec 04

Jan-Dec 04

Farrowing rate

77

83

82

70

78

76

78

77

Regular returns 18-22/39-45 days

5.1

6.9

4.9

9.1

8

6.2

8.2

7.3

Irregular returns 23-38 days

4.3

3.7

4.1

7

1.3

4.9

1.7

4.2

Sows not in pig > 45 days

11

3.1

6

7

1.3

4.9

3.5

5.7

Abortions

0

<1

<1

2

<1

<1

1.7

1.1

Culled pregnant

<1

1.2

2

5.6

5.4

3.5

5.3

2.5

Dead pregnant

1.4

1.2

0

<1

2

<1

1

1.8

  1. 2.

    The average daily feed intake per lactating sow increased from 5.5 kg during 2003 to 6.8 kg for the period March-September 2004.

     
  2. 3.

    The age profile of the herd remained high. A sow parity distribution analysis conducted in September 2004 showed that 23% of the sows in the herd were over parity six compared with 26% in 2003.

     
  3. 4.

    The number of maiden gilts in the pool increased from 33 in January 2004 to 99 in September 2004. An average of seven gilts were served per week from January-October 2004.

     
  4. 5.

    The level of abnormal post-service vaginal discharges recorded from January-June 2004 was 1.7% (Table 15). The type of discharge observed was creamy without blood in sows between seven to 50 days after service. The duration of the discharge varied from one to five days.

     
Table 15

Observations of vulva discharges from January 04-30 June 04 (Farrowed between May 04-October 04)

 

Number of sows

%

Served

874

-

Farrowed

600

68.6

Discharge

15

1.7

  1. 6.

    Vaginal swabs were collected from four sows that had abnormal post-service discharge and sent to the laboratory for bacteriological examination. The results are summarised on Table 16.

     
Table 16

Bacteriology results - vaginal swabs, February-April 2004

Sow ID

Parity

E. coli

Streptococcus

Staphylococcus

Salmonella

1581

7

+

+

+

-

1394

8

+

-

-

-

1479

7

+

+

+

-

2355

Gilt

+

-

+

-

+: Isolated. -: not isolated

  1. 7.

    Sow mortality reduced from 12.9% (October-December 2003) to 7.8% (July-September 2004). One sow was submitted to the laboratory for necropsy. A splenic torsion was reported. A list of presumptive causes of sow death recorded by the farm manager is outlined in Table 17.

     
Table 17

Presumptive diagnosis of cause of sow death and number of sows recorded by the farm manager from January-August 2004

CAUSE

Jan 04

Feb 04

Mar 04

Apr 04

May 04

Jun 04

Jul 04

Aug 04

Unknown

0

0

2

1

1

0

0

2

Infection

0

2

4

1

1

3

1

1

Accident

0

2

3

1

1

1

0

1

Bullied

1

3

1

2

2

1

0

0

Total

1

7

10

5

5

5

1

4

  1. 8.

    Examination of urogenital organs from infertile gilts and sows (parity range 27) on October 20, 2004 revealed that incidence of cystitis had not fallen (Table 18).

     
Table 18

Summary of findings/results of examination of urogenital organs on October 20, 2004

 

Uterus

 

Bladder

 

Kidney

Sow number

Findings/results

Cystitis

Comment

Gross findings

2416

Normal/-

Yes

Mild

Normal

2195

Abnormal

Congestive mucosa

Yes

Mild

Normal

1328

Abnormal

Congestive mucosa.

Small amount of pus

present in the lumen

Yes

Mild

Normal

2450

Abnormal

Congestive mucosa

Yes

Mild

Normal

1795

Normal/E. coli

Yes

Severe

Normal

2206

Normal/-

Yes

Mild

Normal

2452

Normal/-

No

-

Normal

2061

Normal/-

No

-

Normal

1628

Normal/-

No

-

Normal

2448

Normal/-

No

-

Normal

Samples for bacteriological analysis were collected from the uterus, bladder and kidney where gross changes were observed and a urine sample was collected. Culture techniques were conducted on the material collected. E. coli was isolated from uterus and bladder of sow 1795. Eight blood samples were collected and seriological examination for Leptospira spp. was negative.
  1. 9.

    Subsequent case outcomes also resulted in staff changes. Due to an incomplete implementation of recommendations, the unit manager, who started working in the unit in September 2001, was laid off and a new manager was appointed in January 2005.

     

Subsequent case outcome ii

In a meeting with the new unit manager in January 2005 the previous recommendations were reviewed. Emphasis was made on the following points:

  • Implementation of an active culling policy;

  • Introduction of twice-a-day oestrus detection policy in the presence of a boar;

  • Implementation of gilt services in stalls in the sow service area;

  • Upgrading service area hygiene; and,

  • Frequent exposure between served sows/gilts and boars.

After the full implementation of recommendations significant improvements were observed:
  1. 1.

    The farrowing rate increased from 78% (January-March 2005) to 85% for sows and gilts, and to 84% for gilts only for the period April-October 2005; and,

     
  2. 2.

    Sow mortality rate reduced to 4.1% (April-October 2005).

     

Discussion

The impaired fertility problem affected mainly gilts and first parity sows; however, older sows had a higher farrowing rate. Therefore the high parity profile may in the short term have been beneficial to the fertility of the herd.

It is normally stated that oestrus period in the sow lasts 24-60 hours and ovulation occurs

38-42 hours after the onset of heat. Service should take place up to 12 hours before ovulation. A delay in mating could result in lowered embryo survival [13]. Oestrus detection occurred every 24 hours. Therefore, some gilts or sows may have been on the point of ovulation when first detected resulting in conception failure. White [19] suggested checking for signs of oestrus at least every 12 hours.

Gilts that have been moved into a boar pen for service and returned to a group pen can experience increased stress levels sufficient to cause pregnancy failure [18]. In the present case study gilts were returned immediately after service to group pens for a period of three to five days. This may have triggered adrenaline secretion due to excessive mating behaviour of gilts in oestrus by pen mates during the immediate post-service period. White [18] stated that sperm transport to the uterotubal junction and then to the fallopian tube is influenced by oxytocin release and that adrenaline is an antagonist to oxytocin.

Boar exposure to served gilts and sows in the unit was restricted. In this context, it is notable that White [18] reported that the presence of a boar has a beneficial effect on the maintenance of pregnancy, and secondly that boar contact further helps to stimulate oestrus and its detection 18 to 23 days after service if conception has failed to occur.

Suboptimal light intensity (200 lux) was observed in the main dry sow house. Lighting periods were insufficient (six hours per day). Alexander and Muirhead [3] recommended a minimum of 220 lux during the dry period for 14 hours a day to maintain a viable pregnancy. Young [21] stated that high level feeding during the first few days of pregnancy is likely to increase hepatic blood flow and clearance of progesterone resulting in a depressed concentration of progesterone in the blood that may affect embryo survival during early pregnancy. The feed level offered to the gilts and sows in the immediate post-service period was high and may have caused conception failure.

Almond [2] stated that attempts to breed sows with signs of abnormal vulva discharge are usually futile. This is in agreement with this case study in which seven out of 15 discharging sows repeated.

The recommended water requirement for pregnant sows is between 8-12 litres per day [9]. Although adequate volumes of water were supplied to pregnant sows, (approximately 13-19 litres per sow per day), the extra water meant to encourage water consumption, thus reducing periods of recumbency and the intervals between urination episodes. This may have a positive flushing effect on the bacteria in the bladder to increase as coliform bacteria replicate every 40 minutes [4] and cystitis develops when the bladder is not emptied frequently and bacteria concentrate in the urine increasing the risk of infection of the bladder.

Deen and Xue [7] found that where the gilt pool was too small, sow deaths increased due to sows being retained too long in the absence of a suitable replacement. In this case study, the number of gilts available for service was sub-optimal and, as a result, old sows were retained increasing sow deaths and pregnancy losses due to on-farm euthanasia and casualty slaughter. Carroll [5] stated that a sound culling policy is an integral part of herd management as old sows retained in herds lead to decreased productivity.

A significant reduction in sow mortality subsequent to staff change was observed. This was due to a high culling rate (68%) during the first quarter of 2005.

Jones [10] reported that urinary tract disease was one of the main causes of death in sows kept under intensive conditions. In the present study, the sow death rate was over 9% throughout the period of investigation. Carr, Walton and Done [4] stated that if annual sow deaths were in excess of 5%, then cystitis and pyelonephritis must be considered possible causes. The presence of cystitis in a high proportion of old sows may have predisposed to increased sow mortality.

Thornton et al. [15] studied two herds where subclinical urogenital infection (UGI) was present and where discharge rates remained below 2%. They reported that older sows have higher rates of UGI and that subclinical UGI during gestation possibly contributes to a reduction of farrowing rate because of early embryonic deaths, abortions and sow deaths. Similar findings were observed in the present study. The post-service vaginal discharge rate recorded (1.7%) involved mainly parity five to eight sows and was associated with reproductive failure.

The use of ammonium chloride was considered to be of potential benefit as a urinary acidifier to aid in the control of cystitis. Carr et al. [4] and Wendt [17] stated that ammonium chloride can be useful in the prevention of urinary tract infections. The former author stated that ammonium chloride has little effect in the absence of antibiotics. However, Spillane [14] reported a significant improvement in conception rate from the inclusion of ammonium chloride in sow feed in the absence of antibiotics. In the present case, a response to the urinary acidifier, in the absence of antibiotics was not observed. The improved performance in the unit subsequent to a staff change was an interesting feature of this case. Almond (1995) stated that detailed investigations of sow infertility problems on large farms demonstrated that the human factor continues to be a primary cause of unacceptable sow performance.

Conclusion

This study highlights the importance of monitoring and evaluating breeding management practices for the achievement of optimum reproductive performance in pig herds.

Declarations

Acknowledgements

The author wishes to thank Michael Burke and Paul Spillane for their assistance and advice provided in writing this study.

Authors’ Affiliations

(1)
Kiernan Milling, Veterinary Clinic

References

  1. Aherne FX: Improving breeding herd efficiency: An industry perspective. Proceedings of the 29th Annual Pig Health Society Symposium, The Curragh Race Course, Co Kildare, Ireland. 2002, 30-Google Scholar
  2. Almond GW: Investigation into sow infertility. The Pig Journal. 1995, 35: 20-Google Scholar
  3. Alexander TJL, Muirhead MR: Reproduction: Non-infectious infertility. Managing pig health and the treatment of disease. 1997, Sheffield, 5 M Enterprises Limited, 133-1Google Scholar
  4. Carr J, Walton J, Done S: Cystitis and ascending pyelonephritis in the sow. In Practice. 1995, 17: 71-10.1136/inpract.17.2.71.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  5. Carroll C: Sow culling and parity profiles. Proceedings of the pig farmers' conferences Teagasc Longford, Ireland. 1999, 35-Google Scholar
  6. Carroll C: Maximising lactation feed intakes. Proceedings of the pig farmers' conferences Teagasc. 2005, Kilkenny, Ireland, 18-Google Scholar
  7. Deen J, Xue J: Sow mortality in the US: an industry-wide perspective. Proceedings of the Allen D. Leman Swine Conference. 1999, St. Paul, Minnesota, USA, 91-Google Scholar
  8. Finn J: Producing larger litters - the challenge. Proceedings of the pig farmers' conferences Teagasc. 2002, Cavan, Ireland, 40-Google Scholar
  9. Henry SC, Apley : Therapeutics. Diseases of swine. Edited by: Straw BE, D'Allaire S, Mengeling. 1999, Iowa, State University Press, 1155-8Google Scholar
  10. Jones J: The cause of death in sows: A one year survey of 106 herds in Essex. British Veterinary Journal. 1968, 124: 45-PubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. Muirhead MR: Veterinary problems of intensive pig husbandry. Veterinary Record. 1976, 99: 288-10.1136/vr.99.15.288.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. Muirhead MR: Epidemiology and control of vaginal discharges in the sow after service. Veterinary Record. 1986, 119: 233-10.1136/vr.119.10.233.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. Muirhead MR: Reproductive failure in the sow. Pig refresher course, Fertility and infertility. 1991, The University of Liverpool, UK, 59-Google Scholar
  14. Spillane P: Cystitis and endometritis in a 1000 sow unit. The Pig Journal. 1998, 44: 162-Google Scholar
  15. Thornton EJ, Wilson RJ, Connaughton I, et al: Effect of subclinical urogenital infection on reproductive performance in the sow. Proceedings of the 15th International Pig Veterinary Society Congress. 1998, Birmingham, UK, 236-Google Scholar
  16. US Environmental Protection Agency: Proposed criteria for water quality, quality of water for livestock. Environ Rep 4. 1973, 16: 663-Google Scholar
  17. Wendt M: Urinary system disorders of pigs. Proceedings of the 15th International Pig Veterinary Society Congress. 1998, Birmingham, 167-Google Scholar
  18. White M: Reproductive physiology of the pig - theory into practice. Practice. 1996, 18: 108-View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  19. White M: When is the best time to serve a sow? NADIS Pig Focus. 2006, [Accessed March 2007], [http://www.nadis.org.uk]Google Scholar
  20. Whittemore C: Feeding requirements for breeding sows: complex is clever, but simple is safer. Practice. 1998, 20: 304-10.1136/inpract.20.6.304.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  21. Young : Nutrition and management of the modern gilt. Proceedings of the pig farmers' conferences Teagasc. 2003, Kilkenny, Ireland, 41-Google Scholar

Copyright

© The Author(s) 2008