Nutrition and udder health in dairy cows: a review

Vitamin E and selenium

Vitamin E and selenium (Se) are integral components of the antioxidant defence of tissues and cells. Cattle consuming stored forages are likely to be low in vitamin E, unless supplemented, and vitamin E deficiencies are frequently observed in peripartum dairy cows. Pavalata et al. [26] found that about 50% of dairy cows sampled in the Czech Republic had marginal or deficient Se status. Other studies in Slovenia, Germany and Ireland have reported similar findings with the majority of dairy cows being marginal or deficient in Se [22, 12, 43].

Vitamin E is the most important lipid-soluble antioxidant and the biologically most active form is, α-tocopherol [28]. Vitamin E is an integral component of all lipid membranes and has a role in protecting lipid membranes from attack by high tissue concentrations of reactive oxygen species [29]. Selenium is an essential micronutrient present in tissues throughout the body and is important physiologically because it is an integral component of the enzyme glutathione peroxidase [8, 9].Glutathione peroxidase functions in the cytosol of the cell and vitamin E within lipid membranes.

Vitamin E and Se deficiency leads to impaired PMN activity. Dietary supplementation of cows with Se and Vitamin E results in a more rapid PMN influx into milk following intramammary bacterial challenge and increased intracellular killing of ingested bacteria by PMN [34], as well as lowering the frequency and shortening the duration of clinical mastitis [33]. Cows supplemented with 740 IU of vitamin E throughout the dry period had a 37% lower incidence of clinical mastitis during the next lactation compared to cows fed ad libitum haylage providing an estimated 320 IU vitamin E per cow per day. Injection of 0.1 mg Se/kg body weight 21 days before calving had no effect on incidence of clinical mastitis. However, cows supplemented with both Vitamin E and Se had shorter duration of clinical signs than cows supplemented with either micronutrient alone (44% and 46%, respectively) [33].

In a study using first lactation heifers [32] diets of heifers were either unsupplemented or supplemented with Se (0.3 ppm) and vitamin E (1,000 IU/d total intake) from 60 days prepartum and continuing throughout lactation. Supplemented heifers had significantly fewer quarters infected at calving, reduced prevalence of infection throughout lactation, fewer cases of clinical mastitis, infections of shorter duration, and lower milk SCC compared with unsupplemented heifers (Figure 3). Weiss et al. [39] found that high serum Se concentrations were associated with reduced rates of clinical mastitis and low bulk tank milk SCC (Figure 4). Erskine et al. [10] found that herds with the low SCCs (less than or equal to 150,000 cells/ml) had significantly higher mean (+/- SEM) blood Se-dependent glutathione-peroxidase (GSH-Px) activity (35.6 +/- 2.95 mU/mg of hemoglobin) than did the herds with the high SCCs (greater than or equal to 700,000 cells/ml) (20.2 +/- 2.38 mU/ mg of Hb). Whole blood concentrations of Se were also significantly higher in the herds with low SCC (0.133 +/- 0.010 mg/ml of blood) than in the herds with high SCC (0.074 +/- 0.007 mg/ml of blood).

Grasso et al. [11] found that cows fed Se-deficient diets, beginning at least 90 days before their first calving, had significantly (P < 0.05) lower blood Se concentration and blood GSH-Px activity than cows fed Se-supplemented diets (2 mg of Se/cow/d as sodium selenite). Milk neutrophils obtained from cows fed Se-supplemented diets killed a significantly (P < 0.05) higher percentage of ingested bacteria (using an in vitro assay) than did neutrophils from cows fed the Se-deficient diet.

Malbe et al. [21] compared the effects of organic selenium (selenised yeast) and sodium selenite in 100 dairy cows where the feed was supplemented with either 0.2 ppm organic selenium or sodium selenite for eight weeks. Blood selenium (geometric mean) increased within this period from the back-ground level (about 5.6 mg/l) to 167 (Se-yeast) and to 91 mg/l (selenite). The bioavailability of yeast selenium was superior to selenite: the relative bioavailability (selenite = 1) of yeast selenium was 1.4 if blood GSH-Px, 1.9 if blood selenium, and 2.7 if milk selenium was used as the response criterion. Selenium-supplementation showed a positive effect on udder health. The percentage of quarters harbouring mastitis pathogens dropped from 22.9 to 13.0 in the Se-yeast group and from 18.4 to 7.4 in the selenite group during the supplementation period. The effect of selenium on mastitis was also reflected as a decrease in the output of milk somatic cells and N-acetyl-beta-D-glucosaminidase (NAGase).

In Norway, as in many European countries, content of Se in soil is low. The Se content in plants is low and cultivated roughage alone cannot supply the animals with recommended daily intake. Se is added as sodium selenite or organic selenium to all types of commercial concentrate. Se enrichment of concentrates does not ensure adequate Se intake of heifers and dry cows fed mainly roughage. Kommisrud et al. [17] carried out a survey of blood Se concentrations in 254 Norwegian Red heifers and dry cows to study possible associations with management, feeding, health and fertility. They found that the relative risk of mastitis treatment in herds with low Se concentration (<0.06 μg/g) was 1.3 to 1.4 times higher during the first 30 days of lactation than in herds with high concentrations of Se (>0.11 μg/g).

Moyo et al. [23] carried out a meta-analysis of 14 papers between 1984 and 2003 to estimate the magnitude and significance of the weighted summarised effect of vitamin E status on udder health. They found vitamin E supplementation was on average associated with a 14% reduction in the risk of intramammary infection (IMI), a reduction in milk SCC by a factor of 0.70 and a 30% decrease in the risk of occurrence of clinical mastitis (CM). These results support the hypothesis that vitamin E supplementation during the dry and early lactation periods is associated with lower IMI, SCC and CM. However, consideration of vitamin E alone would be folly as all the components of the antioxidant system appear to interact.

Copper

Scaletti et al. [30] carried out a study in first lactation heifers to assess a potential role for dietary copper (Cu) in enhancing resistance to E. coli mastitis. Twenty-three primigravid Holstein heifers were maintained on a basal (6.5 ppm copper; -Cu) diet or a diet supplemented (20 ppm) with copper sulphate (+Cu) beginning at 60 days prepartum until 42 days of lactation. They found that milk bacterial count (log10 cfu/ml) was lower at 12, 18, and 48 hours post challenge (day 34 of lactation) for the +Cu group and that the clinical severity score at 24 hours was lower for the +Cu cows. They concluded that copper supplementation reduced the severity of clinical signs during experimental E. coli mastitis but that the duration of mastitis was unaffected. In a separate study Scaletti et al. [31] attempted to determine the effect of copper source on the response to intramammary challenge with E. coli at day 32 of lactation. Twenty primigravid Holstein heifers were maintained on a basal diet (6.5 ppm Cu; CON) or diets supplemented (10 ppm) with copper sulphate (CUS) or Cu proteinate (Bioplex, Alltech Inc.; CUP) beginning 60 days prepartum until 49 days of lactation. Milk bacterial count (log10 cfu/ml) was lower (P < 0.08) for the CUP group at 24 hours compared to CON and CUS groups. Milk production and dry matter intake (DMI) were measured daily following challenge. Milk production and DMI were expressed as percentages of means for 7 days before challenge using the formula [(b/a) × 100 where a = mean value for the 7 days prior to challenge, and b = daily value post challenge] [14]. Dry matter intake following challenge was greater (P < 0.03) on day 4 post-challenge for CUP and CON groups compared to CUS cows and milk production was greater for CUP cows compared to CON (P < 0.12) and CUS (P < 0.05) cows.

Zinc

Zinc is required for keratin formation. Cows receiving supplemental zinc methionine had significantly (P < 0.03) more teat canal keratin [35].

Several studies have examined the effect of supplemental zinc methionine on SCC and in most cases supplementation statistically or numerically reduced SCC. In some studies SCCs were reduced by about 22% [16]. Organic forms of zinc appear to be better absorbed and retained by the animal. Popovic [27] replaced 33% of the supplemental inorganic zinc sulphate with organic zinc (zinc proteinate) from 45 days pre-calving until 100 days post-calving. Cows receiving the organic zinc had significantly lower SCC (62,670 vs 116,440 cells/ml at day 100 respectively).

Spain et al. [36] replaced 50% of the supplemental inorganic zinc with organic zinc (zinc proteinate) and found that cows had significantly fewer new intra-mammary infections.

Vitamin A and β-carotene

Low concentrations of plasma vitamin A (<80 μg/100 ml) and β-carotene (<200 μg/100 ml) were associated with severity of mastitis (based on California Mastitis Test scores) [5]. Dahlquist and Chew [6] carried out a study where cows were fed 53,000 IU of supplemental vitamin A/day, 173,000 IU/day or 53,000 IU/day plus 300 mg of supplemental β-carotene/day starting three weeks before drying-off and continuing through the dry period. Cows fed the vitamin A plus β-carotene treatment had fewer new infections during the early dry period (27% of previously uninfected quarters) than cows fed the other treatments (49% for low vitamin A and 50% for the high vitamin A treatments).

Chew and Johnston [6], carried out another study using the same treatments but supplementation commenced three weeks before calving and continued through 10 weeks of lactation. The vitamin A plus β-carotene treatment reduced mean SCC during weeks two to eight of lactation (85,000 cells/ml compared with 225,000 and 125,000/ml for low and high vitamin A treatments).

In another study, supplementation (50,000 IU/d of vitamin A, 170,000 IU/d of vitamin A or 50,000 IU/d of vitamin A plus 300 mg of β-carotene per cow) did not affect new infections during the dry period, new infections at calving, total new infections during the experiment, and cases of clinical mastitis [24]. A possible reason for the difference between this study and that of Dahlquist and Chew [7] is the β-carotene status of the control cows. At the start of the study by Dahlquist and Chew, mean plasma concentration of β-carotene was 2.5 mg/L whereas in the Oldham et al. study, the mean concentration was 10 mg/L. However, plasma concentrations of β-carotene in dairy cows should be >3 mg/L to optimise udder health [15].