Open Access

Insights into antimicrobial resistance among long distance migratory East Canadian High Arctic light-bellied Brent geese (Branta bernicla hrota)

Irish Veterinary JournalIris Tréidliachta Éireann201669:13

https://doi.org/10.1186/s13620-016-0072-7

Received: 26 May 2016

Accepted: 3 September 2016

Published: 15 September 2016

Abstract

Background

Antimicrobial resistance (AMR) is the most significant threat to global public health and ascertaining the role wild birds play in the epidemiology of resistance is critically important. This study investigated the prevalence of AMR Gram-negative bacteria among long-distance migratory East Canadian High Arctic (ECHA) light-bellied Brent geese found wintering on the east coast of Ireland.

Findings

In this study a number of bacterial species were isolated from cloacal swabs taken from ECHA light-bellied Brent geese. Nucleotide sequence analysis identified five species of Gram-negative bacteria; the dominant isolated species were Pantoea spp. (n = 5) followed by Buttiauxella agrestis (n = 2). Antimicrobial susceptibility disk diffusion results identified four of the Pantoea spp. strains, and one of the Buttiauxella agrestis strains resistant to amoxicillin-clavulanic acid.

Conclusion

To our knowledge this is the first record of AMR bacteria isolated from long distance migratory ECHA light-bellied Brent geese. This indicates that this species may act as reservoirs and potential disseminators of resistance genes into remote natural ecosystems across their migratory range. This population of geese frequently forage (and defecate) on public amenity areas during the winter months presenting a potential human health risk.

Keywords

Antimicrobial resistance Wild birds Migratory Wildlife Light-bellied Brent geese

Findings

Antimicrobial resistance (AMR) is the greatest challenge facing global public health [1]. The current proliferation of multidrug-resistant pathogens, prevalence of resistant bacteria in the environment and dissemination of resistance genes into novel biogeographic regions is unprecedented [2].

Accurate and meaningful information relating to the dissemination of resistance genes in bacteria among wildlife is of importance in assessing the potential human health risks, and ecological impacts the ingress of these elements have on natural environments [3]. Wild birds are increasingly being studied as vectors for the transmission of resistant bacteria and the resistance genes they harbour [4, 5]. The East Canadian High Arctic (ECHA) light-bellied Brent goose (Branta bernicla hrota) undertakes one of the longest migrations of any Palaearctic goose species, migrating annually from their breeding grounds in the high Canadian Arctic to Ireland in winter [6]. Their preferred food is the intertidal marine grass (Zostera spp), but this resource becomes exhausted in mid to late winter and the birds switch to feeding on terrestrial grasses [7]. In many parts of their range this brings them into close contact with humans as in urban areas these terrestrial grasses tend to be found in public parks and sports grounds. In this study we aimed to investigate the prevalence of clinically relevant antimicrobial resistant Gram-negative enteric bacteria carried among this population of Brent geese during their winter staging on the east coast of Ireland, and inform if these migratory wild birds are potential disseminators of resistance genes into remote natural ecosystems.

The animal trapping and handling undertaken as part of this research was carried out under permit from the British Trust for Ornithology (Permit A4656) and the Irish Medicines Board (Authorisation number AE19130/141). The project was reviewed and deemed fit by the University of Exeter Ethics Committee. A total of 66 Brent geese were caught using explosive cannon nets on North Bull Island, Dublin on the east coast of Ireland (53°22′14.92 N, 6°9′9.98 W) 31st March 2015. All birds had faecal cloacal swabs taken. Samples were placed in a cooler box and transported to the laboratory where they were stored at 4 °C prior to analyses.

Biochemical testing was conducted on all cultured isolates to test for the presence of Escherichia coli using indole and citrate utilisation tests. A sub-set of 16 plates shown to support good colony growth, and screened for E. coli, was selected for further bacterial identification using the Gram stain method. Ten isolates positively identified as Gram-negative bacterial rods following microscopic examination under an oil immersion lens were selected for DNA isolation and PCR. Following user protocol, DNA was isolated from the selected bacterial isolates using the UltraClean® Microbial DNA Isolation Kit and subsequently stored at 4 °C for downstream PCR analysis. The PCR reaction mixture was prepared for 12 samples, including one positive and one negative control, 22 μl of PCR reaction mixture was combined with 3 μl of extracted template DNA [equivalent to approx., 100 ng] for each sample. The forward and reverse bacterial primer pair sequences used in the PCR amplification process were Bakt_341F (5′-CCT ACG GGN GGC WGC AG-3′) and Bakt_805R (5′- GAC TAC HVG GGT ATC TAA TCC-3′) with an amplicon size of 464 base pair(s) (bp) [8]. The thermal cycle for PCR amplification consisted of an initial denaturation step at 95 °C for 30 s, 35 cycles of denaturation at 95 °C for 30 s, annealing at 54 °C for 1 min, extension at 68 °C for 2 min and a final elongation step at 68 °C for 2 min. A preliminary characterisation of the quality of the amplified DNA was conducted, using agarose gel electrophoresis, to establish that the required sequence had been successfully amplified for all ten PCR products along with two controls. Following electrophoresis the DNA bands were excised from the gel under UV light and prepared for sequencing using the Wizard® SV Gel and PCR Clean-Up System. The purified DNA was stored at 4 °C before same day collection and shipment for Sanger sequencing by Source BioScience Sequencing. Five microliter of primers and DNA were sent per reaction at concentrations of 3.2 pmol/μl and 1 ng/μl per 100 bp respectively. The nucleotide sequence queries for the ten bacterial samples were loaded into the National Centre for Biotechnology Information (NCBI) Basic Local Alignment Search Tool (BLAST®) [9]. A standard nucleotide BLAST was conducted using the Megablast programme BLASTN 2.2.31 [10], optimised to identify highly similar sequences. The highest Query cover and Ident percentage scores were used to determine best fit for sequence alignment. Disk diffusion antimicrobial susceptibility testing was conducted on all sequenced and identified isolates in accordance with the standardised methodology developed by the European Committee on Antimicrobial Susceptibility Testing (EUCAST), Version 5.0 [11, 12]. Isolates were tested for susceptibility to Amoxicillin-clavulanic acid (20/10 μg), Cefepime (30 μg), Imipenem (10 μg), Ciprofloxacin (5 μg) and Trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole (1.25/23.75 μg). Inhibition zone diameters were recorded and categorised according to the EUCAST Clinical Breakpoint table v 5.0 [12].

Gram-stain tests identified a selection of Gram-negative rods (n = 11), Gram-negative cocci (n = 1), Gram-positive cocci (n = 1) and samples containing a mix of both Gram-negative rods and cocci (n = 2). Sanger sequencing successfully yielded nucleotide sequences for all ten isolated DNA samples and BLAST analysis identified five species of Gram-negative bacteria. Antimicrobial susceptibility disk diffusion results identified four of the Pantoea spp. strains, and one of the Buttiauxella agrestis strains resistant to amoxicillin-clavulanic acid. All strains were susceptible to the remaining antimicrobial compounds (Table 1).
Table 1

Antimicrobial disk diffusion results, bacterial species, individual bird leg ring codes, antimicrobial agents tested and zone diameter breakpoints for Enterobacteriaceae bacterium

 

Antimicrobial Agent

IPM

10 03BCg

AMC

20/10 μg

SXT

23.75/1.25 μg

CIP

5 μg

FEP

30 μg

 

Enterobacteriaceae bacterium Zone Diameter Breakpoints

S ≥ 22

I 16-21

R <16

S ≥19

I NA

R <19

S ≥ 16

I 13-15

R < 13

S ≥ 22

I 19-21

R < 19

S ≥ 24

I 21-23

R < 21

Ring code

Species

     

XK BY

Pantoea spp.

32 S

15 R

34 S

32 S

31 S

33 S

15 R

34 S

30 S

34 S

35 S

14 R

F -

32 S

33 S

JL BY

Pantoea spp.

34 S

16 R

34 S

32 S

34 S

30 S

14 R

30 S

32 S

36 S

32 S

16 R

36 S

32 S

36 S

BT RR

Pantoea spp.

36 S

19 S

38 S

34 S

38 S

38 S

16 R

36 S

33 S

36 S

37 S

17 R

38 S

34 S

37 S

KL BY

Pantoea spp.

34 S

17 R

34 S

32 S

35 S

36 S

19 S

34 S

32 S

34 S

36 S

17 R

36 S

33 S

36 S

VL BY

Buttiauxella agrestis

30 S

16 R

31 S

27 S

32 S

31 S

14 R

32 S

28 S

32 S

30 S

18 R

30 S

26 S

29 S

Abbreviations: IPM imipenem, AMC amoxicillin-clavulanic acid, SXT sulphamethoxazole/trimethoprim, CIP ciprofloxacin, FEP cefepime, S susceptible, I intermediate, R Resistant, F Fail

Wild birds, particularly migratory waterfowl, can travel immense distances, inhabit a wide variety of environments and may consequently have a significant epidemiological role in the dissemination of resistant bacteria and genes [13]. Non-migratory Canada Geese (Branta canadensis) have previously been identified as reservoirs of multi-resistant strains of E. coli and implicated in microbial water contamination; although non-migratory, these birds could serve to disperse bacteria between widely separated locations [14]. The finding that ECHA light-bellied Brent geese are reservoirs of resistant bacteria has direct implications related to the potential of this species to act as disseminators of resistance into remote habitats throughout their migratory range. The potential for migratory birds to carry AMR bacteria over remarkable distances to remote locations in the Arctic, a region formerly considered one of the last outposts of wilderness, has been demonstrated [15]. Sjölund et al. [15] have shown E. coli isolates expressing multi drug resistance to as many as eight antibiotics among Glaucous gulls in the Arctic. This study also found a juvenile Western sandpiper sampled on the Siberian tundra had resistance to cefadroxil, cefuroxime, and cefpodoxime, a resistance pattern commonly observed in clinical isolates, supporting the theory of introduction by migration and subsequent bacterial transfer between birds. The potential for wild birds to act as vectors for the transmission of clinically relevant resistance genes is substantiated by the discovery of gulls harbouring the same CTX-M types dominant among human isolates in the same area [4, 16]. Hernandez et al. [17] found the carriage rate of ESBL-producing bacteria among Franklin’s gulls in central parts of Chile to be twice as high as those found among the human population in the same area, but the gulls were also found to share sequence types from clinical samples in central Canada, a known nesting place for the birds. These findings contribute to the accumulating evidence supporting the dissemination of resistance by migratory birds, and the reciprocal transmission of resistance determinants between humans and wild birds [18].

It seems likely that the greatest exposure to environmental sources of antibiotics and resistant bacteria the light-bellied Brent geese encounter throughout their migration is during the winter in Ireland, where they experience the most intense contact with anthropogenic-influenced habitats. Previous studies have isolated AMR E. coli from herring gulls (Larus argentatus) sampled in Howth harbour located within 10 km of North Bull Island [1921]. ECHA light-bellied Brent geese migrate north from Ireland during the spring and stage in western Iceland [7], before continuing their journey to breed in the Canadian Arctic [22], satellite tracking has also identified a number of staging grounds in east Greenland [23]. AMR found among this population of Brent geese identifies them as potential disseminators of resistant bacteria, and the genetic resistance determinants they possess, into various ecosystems throughout their range.

Resistance found among the Pantoea species isolates in this research is notable as multiple species groups within Pantoea are viewed as opportunistic pathogens [24]. Perhaps, the greatest zoonotic potential the birds sampled in this research present may be through their use of amenity grasslands. Faecal shedding of resistant bacteria and the persistence of such organisms in the environment may pose a health threat to humans [25]. A study by Benson [26] identified 60 inland sites used by light-bellied Brent geese as winter feeding grounds in Dublin, these include playing pitches, public parks, golf clubs and municipal green spaces in densely populated areas. The large amount of faeces resulting from congregating flocks on amenity grassland could present a possible health risk.

Future research, in conjunction with the findings here, could help elucidate the persistence of resistant bacteria carried by the birds throughout their range at different times of the year, accurately appraise their ability to act as vectors for the dissemination of resistance and define where resistant bacteria is acquired. The enrichment of environmental bacteria with genetic elements containing resistant genes, the dynamic nature of prokaryotic genomes, and ease with which resistance determinants can be shared among commensal and pathogenic bacteria, conspire to present a threat to both human and animal health. This research has identified ECHA light-bellied Brent geese as reservoirs of resistant bacteria and potential disseminators of resistance genes into remote natural habitats in Iceland, Greenland and the Canadian Arctic. The findings in this study add to the accumulating evidence that wild migratory birds are disseminators of resistant bacteria and can play an important role in the epidemiology of resistance. AMR is a global health concern and reaches far beyond clinical settings, understanding the role wildlife plays, particularly migratory birds, is critically important in designing practicable and effectual mitigation measures to address this problem for the future.

Abbreviations

AMR: 

Antimicrobial resistance

ECHA: 

East Canadian High Arctic

EUCAST: 

European committee on antimicrobial susceptibility testing

ESBL: 

Extended-spectrum β-lactamase

Declarations

Acknowledgements

This work derives from M.Sc. studies in Wildlife Conservation & Management at University College Dublin. The authors wish to thank Irish Brent Goose Research Group, Tom Bodey, Ian Cleasby and Freydis Vigfusdottir for their help with collection of samples.

Funding

SB is funded by a European Research Councils consolidators grant (STATEMIG: 310820).

Availability of data and material

Not applicable.

Authors’ contributions

AA performed the sampling, analysis and wrote the draft of this report. JW assisted in the analysis. SB facilitated the sampling. SF and BJMcM supervised all stages of the work presented in this report and critically read the report. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.

Competing interests

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Consent for publication

Not applicable.

Ethics approval and consent to participate

The animal trapping and handling undertaken as part of this research was carried out under permit from the British Trust for Ornithology (Permit A4656) and the Irish Medicines Board (Authorisation number AE19130/141). The project was reviewed and deemed fit by the University of Exeter Ethics Committee.

Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.

Authors’ Affiliations

(1)
UCD School of Agriculture & Food Science, University College Dublin
(2)
UCD-Centre for Food Safety, School of Public Health, Physiotherapy & Sports Science, University College Dublin
(3)
Institute for Global Food Security, School of Biological Sciences, Queen’s University Belfast
(4)
Centre for Ecology & Conservation, University of Exeter

References

  1. Laxminarayan R, Duse A, Wattal C, Zaidi AKM, Wertheim HFL, Sumpradit N, et al. Antibiotic resistance - the need for global solutions. Lancet Infect Dis. 2013;13:1057–98.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. Levy SB, Marshall B. Antibacterial resistance worldwide: causes, challenges and responses. Nat Med. 2004;10:S122–9.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. Chee-Sanford JC, Mackie RI, Koike S, Krapac IG, Lin Y-F, Yannarell AC, et al. Fate and transport of antibiotic residues and antibiotic resistance genes following land application of manure waste. J Environ Qual. 2009;38:1086–108.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. Bonnedahl J, Drobni P, Johansson A, Hernandez J, Melhus A, Stedt J, et al. Characterization, and comparison, of human clinical and black-headed gull (Larus ridibundus) extended-spectrum β-lactamase-producing bacterial isolates from Kalmar, on the southeast coast of Sweden. J Antimicrob Chemother. 2010;65:1939–44.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. Hernandez J, Bonnedahl J, Eliasson I, Wallensten A, Comstedt P, Johansson A, et al. Globally disseminated human pathogenic Escherichia coli of O25b-ST131 clone, harbouring blaCTX-M-15, found in Glaucous-winged gull at remote Commander Islands, Russia. Environ Microbiol Rep. 2010;2:329–32.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. Robinson JA, Colhoun K, Gudmundsson GA, Boertman OJ, Merne M, O’Briain M, et al. Light-Bellied Brent Goose Branta Bernicla Hrota (East Canadian High Arctic Population) in Canada, Ireland, Iceland, France, Greenland, Scotland, Wales, England, the Channel Islands and Spain: 1960/61-1999/2000, Waterbird Review Series. Slimbridge: Wildfowl and Wetlands Trust; 2004.Google Scholar
  7. Inger R, Gudmundsson GA, Ruxton GD, Newton J, Colhoun K, Auhage S, et al. Habitat utilisation during staging affects body condition in a long distance migrant, Branta bernicla hrota: potential impacts on fitness? J Avian Biol. 2008;39:704–8.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  8. Herlemann DP, Labrenz M, Jürgens K, Bertilsson S, Waniek JJ, Andersson AF. Transitions in bacterial communities along the 2000 km salinity gradient of the Baltic Sea. ISME J. 2011;5:1571–9.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  9. Johnson M, Zaretskaya I, Raytselis Y, Merezhuk Y, Mcginnis S, Madden TL. NCBI BLAST: a better web interface. Nucleic Acids Res. 2008;36:W5–9.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  10. Zhang Z, Schwartz S, Wagner L, Miller W. A Greedy Algorithm for Aligning DNA Sequences. J Comput Biol. 2000;7:203–14.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. EUCAST. European Committee on Antimicrobial Susceptibility Testing. Disk Diffusion Test Methodology, version 5.0, 26 January 2015, Available at: http://www.eucast.org/ast_of_bacteria/disk_diffusion_methodology/. (Accessed 09 July 2015).
  12. EUCAST. European Committee on Antimicrobial Susceptibility Testing. Breakpoint tables for interpretation of MICs and zone diameters. Version 5.0, 2015. Available at: http://www.eucast.org/clinical_breakpoints/. (Accessed 09 July 2015).
  13. Allen HK, Donato J, Wang HH, Cloud-Hansen KA, Davies J, Handelsman J. Call of the wild: antibiotic resistance genes in natural environments. Nat Rev Microbiol. 2010;8:251–9.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  14. Cole D, Drum DJ, Stallknecht DE, White DG, Lee MD, Ayers S, et al. Free-living Canada Geese and Antimicrobial Resistance. Emerg Infect Dis. 2005;11:935–8.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  15. Sjölund M, Bonnedahl J, Hernandez J, Bengtsson S, Cederbrant G, Pinhassi J, et al. Dissemination of multidrug-resistant bacteria into the Arctic. Emerg Infect Dis. 2008;14:70–2.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  16. Simões RR, Poirel L, Costa PMD, Nordmann P. Seagulls and Beaches as Reservoirs for Multidrug-Resistant Escherichia coli. Emerg Infect Dis. 2010;16:110–2.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  17. Hernandez J, Johansson A, Stedt J, Bengtsson S, Porczak A, Granholm S, et al. Characterization and Comparison of Extended-Spectrum β-Lactamase (ESBL) Resistance Genotypes and Population Structure of Escherichia coli Isolated from Franklin's Gulls (Leucophaeus pipixcan) and Humans in Chile. PLoS ONE. 2013;8:e76150.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  18. Bonnedahl J, Järhult JD. Antibiotic resistance in wild birds. Ups J Med Sci. 2014;119:113–6.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  19. Smith S, Wang J, Fanning S, Mcmahon BJ. Antimicrobial resistant bacteria in wild mammals and birds: a coincidence or cause for concern? Ir Vet J. 2014;67:8.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  20. Carroll D, Wang J, Fanning S, Mcmahon BJ. Antimicrobial resistance in wildlife: implications for public health. Zoonoses Public Health. 2015;62:534–42.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  21. Stedt J, Bonnedahl J, Hernandez J, Waldenström J, Mcmahon BJ, Tolf C, et al. Carriage of CTX-M type extended spectrum β-lactamases (ESBLs) in gulls across Europe. Acta Vet Scand. 2015;57:1–8.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  22. Gudmundsson GA, Benvenuti S, Alerstam T, Papi F, Lilliendahl K, Akesson S. Examining the limits of flight and orientation performance: satellite tracking of Brent geese migrating across the Greenland ice-cap. Proc R Soc Lond B Biol Sci. 1995;261:73–9.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  23. Robinson JA, Gudmundsson GA, Clausen P. Flyways of the East Canadian High Arctic Light-bellied Brent Goose Branta bernicla hrota: results of a satellite telemetry study. In: Boere GC, Galbraith CA, Stroud DA, editors. Waterbirds around the world. Edinburgh: The Stationery Office; 2006.Google Scholar
  24. Nadarasah G, Stavrinides J. Quantitative evaluation of the host-colonizing capabilities of the enteric bacterium Pantoea using plant and insect hosts. Microbiology. 2014;160:602–15.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  25. Fallacara DM, Monahan CM, Morishita TY, Wack RF. Fecal shedding and antimicrobial susceptibility of selected bacterial pathogens and a survey of intestinal parasites in free-living waterfowl. Avian Dis. 2001;45:128–35.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  26. Benson L. Use of inland feeding sites by Light-bellied Brent geese in Dublin 2008–2009: a new conservation concern. Ir Birds. 2009;8:563–70.Google Scholar

Copyright

© The Author(s). 2016

Advertisement