The total cost of rearing a heifer on Dutch dairy farms: calculated versus perceived cost
© Mohd Nor et al. 2015
Received: 25 February 2015
Accepted: 5 December 2015
Published: 15 December 2015
As farmers do not often keep a record of the expenditures for rearing, an economic tool that provides insight into the cost of rearing is useful. In the Netherlands, an economic tool (Jonkos) has been developed that can be used by farmers to obtain insight into the cost of rearing on their farm. The first objective of this study is to calculate the total cost of rearing young stock in Dutch dairy herds using Jonkos. The second objective is to compare the calculated total cost of rearing with the farmers’ own estimation of the cost of rearing (the perceived cost).
Information was available for 75 herds that reared their own young stock and who had used the Jonkos tool. The perceived cost of rearing young stock was only available for 36 herds. In the 75 herds, the average herd size was 100 dairy cows. The average calculated total cost of rearing a heifer was €1,790. The average perceived total cost of rearing a heifer (including labour and housing costs) was €1,030.
Most Dutch farmers in the study underestimated the total cost of rearing. The Jonkos economic tool has the advantage that herd-specific information can be entered as input values. The output of the tool can improve the awareness of farmers about the total costs of rearing. This awareness can lead to a higher priority of young stock rearing and consequently to an improved quality of young stock rearing.
KeywordsCosts Dairy Young stock Economics
Most Dutch dairy herds rear their own young stock to replace culled dairy cows. The total cost of rearing includes several cost factors, such as the costs of feed, housing, labour, breeding, healthcare, carcass disposal and the cost of buying heifers when not enough replacement heifers are available. Mourits et al.  estimated the total cost of rearing a heifer in a Dutch dairy herd (excluding labour costs) using a dynamic model. The estimates ranged between €907 and €1,134 per heifer. The cost of rearing depends on biological factors, which make it difficult to estimate. Therefore, simulation models are often used to estimate the costs [2–4]. Mohd Nor et al.  used a stochastic model that included uncertainty in diseases and variation in fertility and growth to estimate the total cost of rearing a heifer in a Dutch dairy herd. They estimated that the total cost of rearing a heifer was €1,567 per successfully reared heifer, with costs for feed and labour contributing the most to the total cost . In the US, the average total cost of rearing a heifer (including labour costs) was estimated at $1,124 (€788)  and $1,808 (€1,320) .
In practice, farmers do not keep a record of the expenditures made for rearing their young stock. Moreover, it is hard to separate the cost of rearing young stock from the costs for the entire dairy herd enterprise. For instance, because heifers are fed the same type of feed as dairy cows, it is difficult to estimate the proportion of feed costs attributable to young stock. Because of the difficulty of knowing the costs of rearing young stock, it is expected that farmers underestimate the costs of young stock rearing and consequently do not prioritize young stock rearing enough. It is thus important for farmers to become more aware of the true cost of rearing.
An economic tool that dairy farmers can use to estimate the total cost of rearing a heifer, which is specific for their own herd, has not been developed yet. Furthermore, it is expected that farmers underestimate the costs for young stock rearing, but there is no evidence for that yet. The first objective of this study is to estimate the total cost of rearing young stock in individual Dutch dairy herds using a newly developed economic tool. The second objective is to compare the estimated total cost of rearing with the farmers’ own estimation of the cost (perceived cost of rearing). The results of this study can help farmers to become more aware of the total cost of rearing a heifer, and to prioritize young stock rearing more which will improve the quality of young stock rearing.
Materials and methods
Jonkos is an economic tool, which has been developed to calculate the cost of rearing young stock. Jonkos was developed to raise farmer awareness about the cost of rearing young stock. The estimation can be made as farm-specific or as general as the farmer wishes, by entering either general information or detailed farm information. The tool calculates both the total cost for the dairy farm and the cost per heifer. Jonkos is developed in Microsoft Excel (version 2010) and was developed as a joint collaboration between WUR Livestock research, Wageningen University Business Economics group, Faculty of Veterinary Medicine of Utrecht University and DLV (Dienst Landbouw Voorlichting). The tool Jonkos is available (in Dutch) on the internet (http://www.verantwoordeveehouderij.nl/show/JONKOS-1.htm).
An additional worksheet is available for each topic, where more detailed information on the topic can be entered. In the worksheet ‘general farm information and numbers’ the costs for carcass disposal, revenues foregone from not selling heifer calves and the revenues from selling excess heifers are calculated. These costs and revenues are calculated by taking into account first calving age, weaning age, mortality rate, and prices for new born calves and heifers. In the worksheet ‘ration’ the costs for milk replacer and concentrates are calculated. For the costs for milk replacer, the weaning age, the amount of milk replacer per day and the price are taken into account. Costs for concentrates were calculated by taking into account concentrates intake (included in the main input–output worksheet) and the costs for concentrates. In addition, in this worksheet the roughage requirements (maize silage, grass silage and fresh grass) are calculated (expressed in kg DM). These requirements are calculated by taking into account the intake DM per day for grass silage, maize silage and fresh grass, the percentage maize silage and grass silage in the ration (included in the main input–output worksheet) and the number of days grazing (included in the main input–output worksheet). In the worksheet ‘roughage’ the costs for crop costs, contract work, and purchase of roughage are calculated. The crop costs (separately calculated for grass and maize) are calculated by taking into the amount of land needed for young stock, and costs for seed, pesticides, fertilizer and fences. The amount of land needed is calculated by taking into account the roughage requirements and the yield per hectare. The costs for contract work (separately calculated for grass and maize) are calculated by taking into account the amount of land needed for young stock, and costs for ploughing, seeding, mowing, fertilizing, controlling weeds, and harvesting. If a farm is purchasing roughage, the roughage requirements and costs per kg DM are used to calculate the costs for roughage. In the worksheet ‘livestock’ the costs for health (included in the main input–output worksheet), insemination, shaving, bedding, interest and destruction of dead animals are calculated. In the worksheet ‘land and housing’ the costs for leasing land and housing are calculated. The costs for leasing land are calculated by taking into account the amount of land needed for young stock and the lease price of land (included in the main input–output worksheet). Housing costs includes interest, depreciation and maintenance, and were calculated by using the replacement value of the barn (included in the main input–output worksheet). The worksheet ‘manure’ includes the costs for manure removal, and were calculated by taken into account the manure production of young stock and the price for removal (included in the main input–output worksheet). Manure removal takes into account the Dutch manure policy. In the worksheet ‘labour and installations’ the costs for a milk feeding machine, an automatic concentrate feeding machine and a machine for manure removing are calculated. Interest, depreciation and maintenance costs are taken into account for these machines. The worksheet also includes the calculation of labour costs, which was calculated by taking into account the amount of hours needed for young stock and the price of labour (included in the main input–output worksheet). In the worksheet ‘water and energy’ the costs for water and energy are calculated. The costs for water was calculated by taking into account the water requirements (included drinking water and water for the milk replacer) and the price of water (included in the main input–output worksheet). Costs for energy are calculated by taking into account energy for heating milk replacer, machines and lighting, and the costs for energy.
In this way, all the costs that can be attributed to the rearing of young stock are taken into account in the Jonkos tool. All worksheets have additional columns, where Dutch averages are provided for each parameter, to assist farmers who do not know their individual farm-specific value. For instance, for the amount of DM intake for young stock older than 1 year, a value 8.8 kg DM per day  was suggested. The average Dutch values are based on literature [3,6] and the expertise of the developers. Economic parameters are based on Vermeij et al. .
Before Jonkos was used on farms, the tool was internally validated, and where necessary adapted. The effect of inputs on outputs was checked by judging whether the effect was plausible. In addition, the outcomes were also compared with literature, especially with Mohd Nor et al.  which was also based on Dutch circumstances.
Using the Jonkos economic tool, the data on the cost of rearing young stock were collected from two separate studies. The first study was conducted in September 2011. In this study, 432 herds associated with the Utrecht University Large Animal practice (ULP Harmelen) were approached by email. In addition, Veterinary Health Centre ‘De Peuvers Esch’ contacted 10 of their clients by telephone to ask them if they were willing to participate in this study. In total 43 herds agreed to participate (34 from the ULP Harmelen and 9 from the De Peuvers Esch). The second study was conducted in June 2013. In this study, 177 herds associated with the Veterinary Centre Zuid-Oost Drenthe were approached by email, of which 44 herds agreed to participate.
Each study was conducted by a student from the Faculty of Veterinary Medicine (Utrecht, the Netherlands). All herds in each study were visited by one student in the last phase of his or her study. The only information provided by the student prior to the interview was that the student would come to the farm to calculate, together with the farmer, the costs of young stock rearing of the farm. No further information was provided. In the first study, the farmers were first interviewed about the perceived total cost of rearing. The farmer was asked about an estimate for the costs of rearing a heifer, and it was not allowed to look this up in recording systems or to use other sources. Subsequently, it was asked whether the estimate of the farmer included labour and housing costs. In the second study, these questions were not asked. Then, together with the student, the farmers used Jonkos to obtain an estimation of the total cost of rearing. Most entries of the farmers were based on their own estimations, and rarely recording systems or other sources were used. It was compulsory to fill in the main worksheet (see Fig. 1), and only when the farmer thought that his farm deviated from Dutch average the other worksheets were filled in. For instance, when the farm had deviating costs for insemination, mortality rate, and revenues for selling calves and heifers. Filling in Jonkos took about 20 min for each farmer. For four herds in the second study, the data was not useable as the calculations failed to save properly, leaving a total of 83 dairy herds for both studies. Only Jonkos data and the perceived heifer rearing costs were available about the farms, and only that information was used for the analyses.
The data editing was performed using Statistical Analysis System (SAS) version 9.2 (SAS Institute Inc., Cary, NC). Of the 83 herds, seven herds were specialized heifer rearing farms and one herd sold all heifer calves at 2 weeks of age. Because these eight herds differed substantially from dairy farms they were excluded from the analysis, leaving 75 dairy herds. The descriptive results for inputs and outputs were averaged across these herds. In the first study, the farmers were asked whether their perceived total cost for rearing young stock included both labour and housing costs, included labour costs only, included housing costs only, or excluded both labour and housing costs. The difference between the perceived costs and the calculated costs was calculated as the perceived cost minus the calculated cost of rearing a heifer as calculated by Jonkos, where the calculated cost was adjusted for the appropriate inclusion of labour and housing costs.
Results and discussion
The average herd characteristics in the 75 Dutch dairy herds that rear own young stock
Milk production (kg/herd/year)
Milk production (kg/cow/year)
Number of present young stock per year
Descriptive statistics of the cost components of rearing a heifer (€), estimated using the Jonkos tool for 75 dairy herds
Machines and installations
Water and energy
Previous studies indicated that feed costs accounted for 50 % to 73 % of the total cost of rearing [3,5]. In contrast, feed costs accounted for only 15 % of the total cost in the Jonkos study. This difference arises because of a different way of classifying costs. Feed costs in the Jonkos study only included the cost of milk replacer and concentrates for heifer calves. Other feed costs (production of roughage for heifers) were included in land ownership, contract work costs, and crops costs. If the same cost classification is used as the previous studies, then the actual feed costs during rearing accounted for 43 % of the total cost of rearing. This percentage is still slightly lower than previous studies [3,5].
Costs, revenues, and net cost of rearing a heifer per herd (€), estimated using the Jonkos tool for 75 dairy herds
Revenue foregone from not selling heifer calves
Buying new replacement heifers when not enough
Selling excess heifers
Net cost of rearing
In the Netherlands it is common to rear your own young stock. So farm systems where all replacement heifers are purchased do hardly exist. In fact, Dutch dairy farms keep (almost) all their newborn heifer calves to ensure enough young stock are available to replace culled dairy cows . It is not known whether purchasing all replacement heifers is beneficial, and the market price of replacement heifers will highly influence this. The average price for purchasing heifers was €1015 per heifer in 2014 . Because purchasing all replacement heifers is not common in the Netherlands it was decided to not include that calculation in Jonkos. Jonkos takes however into account when the farm has too little heifers available and when subsequently new heifers have to be purchased.
The average total cost of rearing a heifer was €1,790, estimated using the economic tool Jonkos. The Jonkos tool allows a farmer to use herd-specific information to estimate the total cost of rearing young stock and the tool is easy for farmers to use. For some cost components quite detailed information must be provided, and therefore results are sometimes based on best guesses of the farmers. The average perceived total cost of rearing a heifer was €1,030, showing that Dutch farmers underestimated the true cost of rearing. By using the tool farmers can become more aware of the costs of young stock rearing. It is expected that when farmers realise that the costs for young stock rearing are much higher than estimated, that the farmers start prioritizing young stock rearing more, which will improve quality of young stock rearing. Moreover, filling in the Jonkos tool can give insight in the money that can be saved by a lower first calving age and/or retaining less young stock.
The authors thank the participating farmers.
Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.
- Mourits MCM, Van der Fels-Klerx HJ, Huirne RBM, Huyben MWC. Dairy-heifer management in the Netherlands. Prev Vet Med. 2000;46:197–208.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Gabler MT, Tozer PR, Heinrichs AJ. Development of a cost analysis spreadsheet for calculating the costs to raise a replacement dairy heifer. J Dairy Sci. 2000;83:1104–9.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Mohd Nor N, Steeneveld W, Mourits MCM, Hogeveen H. Estimating the costs of rearing young dairy cattle in the Netherlands using a simulation model that accounts for uncertainty related to diseases. Prev Vet Med. 2012;106:214–24.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Tozer PR, Heinrichs AJ. What affects the costs of raising replacement dairy heifers: a multiple-component analysis. J Dairy Sci. 2001;84:1836–44.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Heinrichs AJ, Jones CM, Gray SM, Heinrichs PA, Cornelisse SA, Goodling RC. Identifying efficient dairy heifer producers using production costs and data envelopment analysis. J Dairy Sci. 2013;96:7355–62.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Blanken K, Evers A, Ferwerda R, Hollander CJ, Kasper G, de Koning K, et al. Animal Sciences Group, Wageningen UR. Handboek Melkveehouderij. Zutphen: Uitgeverij Roodbont; 2006.Google Scholar
- Vermeij I, Bosma B, Evers A, Harlaar W, Vink I. KWIN 2010–2011 (Kwantitatieve Informatie Veehouderij 2010–2011). Handboek 13. Lelystad: Livestock Research; 2010.Google Scholar
- CRV, 2012 (in Dutch, vocabulary in English) https://www.crv4all.nl/downloads/prestaties/jaarstatistieken/ Accessed 15 January 2015.
- Mohd Nor N, Steeneveld W, Mourits MCM, Hogeveen H. The optimal number of heifer calves to be reared as dairy replacements. J Dairy Sci. 2015;98:861–71.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- LEI, 2014 (in Dutch). http://www3.lei.wur.nl/prijzenPopup/default.aspx?Lang=0 Accessed 3 December 2015.